terminal-boredom.com

Terminal Boardumb => Music Shit => Topic started by: Mitch on December 26, 2008, 02:44:24 PM

Title: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Mitch on December 26, 2008, 02:44:24 PM
...
Title: Re: YOUNG STEVE THREAD (cuz Rick whined)
Post by: Jared on December 26, 2008, 02:47:09 PM
I was just going to start one called the Rectal Depth of the Pirhanas.
Title: Re: YOUNG STEVE THREAD (cuz Rick whined)
Post by: DJ Rick on December 26, 2008, 02:47:50 PM

I'm gonna whine once more...."Rectal depth" needs to be in the title of this thread.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas (PS: fuck DJ RICK)
Post by: erickelric on December 26, 2008, 04:21:08 PM
Rectal Depth needs to be the name of a band. Some shitty power electronics/grind combo.

As far as the Nth time this "argument" has come up, I just wanna say this: Steve, your notion of people "tricking" themselves into liking something makes me wanna slap you 17000x in the face with a newly-soaked cum rag. It's not that people don't do it, everyone has, but this idea if it's "difficult" people do it. For instance, that last Piranhas LP is just overloaded with sick RIFFS and CHANGES and totally slays/shreds/various other descriptions you have very little real world experiences with. To me, it sounds like dudes who were listening to Henry Cow,, Gong, and other fucked=up prog and Rock in Opposition type stuff. So, it's really not far out there if you know anything about music besides, y'know, yer average rocknroll/punk/pop bullshit. Which brings me to the fact that I'm suure youj've "tricked" yerself into liking some total garbage in the, oh let's say, J-power-pop spectrum cuz you felt like you "should" like it cuz some dude from Teengenerate mentioned he liked it in some zine.

Also, I've seen Teengenerate AND Peter Brotzmann and they ain't as far from each other as you might think. Admittedly, TG was a lot more fun, but the intensity was the same.

Oh, and you are a total snob when it comes to literature, which is great and all (viva la college), but makes you a complete hypocrite when it comes to music.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas (PS: fuck DJ RICK)
Post by: Sukebe GG on December 26, 2008, 04:27:09 PM
I traded some Japanese CDs and CDrs with Jeff Kopp years ago and I let him pick stuff he thought I should check out. One was the Piranhas. How 'bout that?
What's the Piranhas' release that we are supposed to hate? I think I might like it.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas (PS: fuck DJ RICK)
Post by: erickelric on December 26, 2008, 04:31:22 PM
'Piscis Clangor.'

A much more "difficult" artistic statement, than, say, 'Crime and Punishment.'
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: sarim on December 26, 2008, 04:41:15 PM
why should anybody hate piscis clangor? i thought it was better than that first album.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 26, 2008, 04:48:39 PM
Dunno if it's "better" (that early shit's some of my fave punk of the last decade), just different and still awesome and NOT THAT WEIRD. It's made with guitars/basses/drums/keyboards. Not conch shells, turtle spines, whale-calls, and alabaster trombones. Not even synths made from the brains of Pygmies. Harry Partch would probably say it sounds like Chuck Berry.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: sarim on December 26, 2008, 05:01:57 PM
as you wage your one man vendetta i imagine steve holding his relatives close as they enjoy the rewarding pleasures of each others company, entranced by the gentle magic of the holiday season, and filled with by the deeply rewarding validation of family and togetherness.  then steve goes in the other room and checks for updates on hornyjapslutsandtheircre amysidewayspussies.biz as you rip a bong halfway across the country.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Hugh Jass on December 26, 2008, 05:17:55 PM
All of this Piranhas talk makes me think I should revisit them. I got the Erotic Grit Moves CD when it came out. I listened to it once or twice, didn't like it, sold it. It's still probably too challenging for the likes of me, but maybe I can trick myself into enjoying it 6 years later.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: sarim on December 26, 2008, 05:33:21 PM
its fuckin great.  to my young and fairly virginal ears it was fuckin insane.  i heard that shit on fmu while drivin down the fdr.  i was not drivin as i was very young.  i got outta the car and immediately went to wowsville and bought the cd.  i went to go see em play right after that at the local and they woudlnt let me in.  i went to go see em again the next night and i got in somehow.  i think they drew xs on my hands. im pretty sure they played again the next year on halloween.  i wasnt gonna go but i got on a train in an attempt to escape arrest for stealin candy from kids and so i went to the show. mr purciello the assistant principal called me into his office because somebody said they saw me stealin candy in a spiderman costume.  those motherfuckers didnt have shit on me though. piranhas were fuckin nuts.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 26, 2008, 05:39:04 PM
Sarim, you always know how to put everything in perspective.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Late Twenties Steve on December 26, 2008, 06:01:36 PM
Rectal Depth needs to be the name of a band. Some shitty power electronics/grind combo.

As far as the Nth time this "argument" has come up, I just wanna say this: Steve, your notion of people "tricking" themselves into liking something makes me wanna slap you 17000x in the face with a newly-soaked cum rag. It's not that people don't do it, everyone has, but this idea if it's "difficult" people do it. For instance, that last Piranhas LP is just overloaded with sick RIFFS and CHANGES and totally slays/shreds/various other descriptions you have very little real world experiences with. To me, it sounds like dudes who were listening to Henry Cow,, Gong, and other fucked=up prog and Rock in Opposition type stuff. So, it's really not far out there if you know anything about music besides, y'know, yer average rocknroll/punk/pop bullshit. Which brings me to the fact that I'm suure youj've "tricked" yerself into liking some total garbage in the, oh let's say, J-power-pop spectrum cuz you felt like you "should" like it cuz some dude from Teengenerate mentioned he liked it in some zine.

Also, I've seen Teengenerate AND Peter Brotzmann and they ain't as far from each other as you might think. Admittedly, TG was a lot more fun, but the intensity was the same.

Oh, and you are a total snob when it comes to literature, which is great and all (viva la college), but makes you a complete hypocrite when it comes to music.

Erick, spare me the self-righteous condescension. Like I write every time this comes up: MUSIC AND LITERATURE ARE TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT FORMS OF ART. They're apprehended in different ways: literature requires a discourse between the intellect and the art object. You need to think about what you are reading even if it's on the basic level of a beginning reader book like "See Sad Sam" because mentation is required to make sense of the abstract symbols written language is composed of. However an infant can be affected by music because music DOESN'T require any mental activity in order for it to have an affect on someone.

You know what actually would make me a hypocrite? If I allowed myself to be browbeaten into pretending to like things just because they were in favor with a vocal majority.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Late Twenties Steve on December 26, 2008, 06:06:22 PM
Oh, and all I ever listen to is Japanese powerpop. All day everyday. Nothing else. Nope.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Hugh Jass on December 26, 2008, 06:09:50 PM
You know what actually would make me a hypocrite? If I allowed myself to be browbeaten into pretending to like things just because they were in favor with a vocal majority.
Vocal majority? Ha! In what bizarro world do 10 people on an esoteric music board constitute a majority of anything?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 26, 2008, 06:10:55 PM
I'm not asking you to fucking like it, dude. I could care less. You are missing the point YET AGAIN. And you are an ass if you think music doesn't require, or CAN require, intellectual engagement. I don't "need" to think about the Piranhas to enjoy them, but I can if I want, and the enjoyment is not lessened by said thinking. You just want music to hit yr tiny little G spots and make everything hunky dory.

And music and literature may be different forms of art, but both are art nevertheless, and why can't they be held to the same (broad) standards? Just because you took classes to understand Russian authors doesn't mean you couldn't take classes to understand Stockhausen, Coltrane, and the Master Musicians of Joujoka. I fail to see why this isn't obvious. Please enlighten me.


Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Late Twenties Steve on December 26, 2008, 06:12:18 PM
You know what actually would make me a hypocrite? If I allowed myself to be browbeaten into pretending to like things just because they were in favor with a vocal majority.
Vocal majority? Ha! In what bizarro world do 10 people on an esoteric music board constitute a majority of anything?

Just within the context of here. I don't think anybody I see on a regular basis has even heard the Piranhas. Could be wrong though.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Sukebe GG on December 26, 2008, 06:12:55 PM
All media exist to invest our lives with artificial perceptions and arbitrary values.
Marshall McLuhan

Yep, Piscis rocks - like Teengenerate meets Brotzmann on Saccharine Trusts front lawn...
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 26, 2008, 06:15:58 PM
Oh, and all I ever listen to is Japanese powerpop. All day everyday. Nothing else. Nope.

Is this irony? I need to take this into aesthetic consideration.


You know what actually would make me a hypocrite? If I allowed myself to be browbeaten into pretending to like things just because they were in favor with a vocal majority.
Vocal majority? Ha! In what bizarro world do 10 people on an esoteric music board constitute a majority of anything?

Just within the context of here. I don't think anybody I see on a regular basis has even heard the Piranhas. Could be wrong though.


Is this double irony? This thread was partly started because everyone, outside of about 5 of us, actively and passionately hate that Piranhas record. And we're sick of it. Vocal Majority? Didn't they have a track on 'Not So Quiet on The Western Front?'
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 26, 2008, 06:24:09 PM
Steve, this is why people get pissed: You basically are telling us that we are lying to ourselves why we enjoy something and that we are soft-headed dumbfucks fooled by fake artists and jive turkeys who spend lots of time and money playing their dastardly tricks on our desperate need to be "cool" and "different."

Well, fuck you, it ain't so.

Maybe you just feel sorry for us, but, my friend, I feel sorry for you. Your capacity for the abstract is like a 6'x6' cell. Chalk up another one.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Late Twenties Steve on December 26, 2008, 06:47:24 PM
I'm not asking you to fucking like it, dude. I could care less. You are missing the point YET AGAIN. And you are an ass if you think music doesn't require, or CAN require, intellectual engagement. I don't "need" to think about the Piranhas to enjoy them, but I can if I want, and the enjoyment is not lessened by said thinking. You just want music to hit yr tiny little G spots and make everything hunky dory.

And music and literature may be different forms of art, but both are art nevertheless, and why can't they be held to the same (broad) standards? Just because you took classes to understand Russian authors doesn't mean you couldn't take classes to understand Stockhausen, Coltrane, and the Master Musicians of Joujoka. I fail to see why this isn't obvious. Please enlighten me.


Music doesn't require intellectual engagement because it can be apprehended and appreciated without mental activity. You shouldn't need to think about music because once you start thinking about an aesthetic experience it snaps you out of a direct experience of the art in question and puts you in the secondary realm of analysis. Analysis is great and all, but unless it comes after the fact you aren't able to experience a state of aesthetic arrest where everything drops off save for a feeling of awe and wonder before the grand lines of nature as manifested in a work of art. Instead you're thinking "isn't this great" rather than feeling the "whatness" of the artwork in question. Literature is the only form of art that plays by a different set of rules because by its very nature you need to think about it in order to appreciate it. While there are a lot of linguistic tricks a skilled writer can play with tools like meter, word choice, landscape, etc. that can give a reader the experience of aesthetic arrest, literature remains at its most potent when it deals with the world of abstract ideas which require discourse with the intellect. Therefore I would classify literature as an intellectual form of art.

Music on the other hand is at its most potent when it appeals to emotions. Music cannot convey the types of ideas literature can unless it is in the form of lyrics (which have obvious limitations compared to a novel) because the "ideas" expressed by music are so abstract that they cannot be verbalized. Even concepts like rhythm, melody, meter, pitch, etc. fall short of describing the ideas expressed by music. Rather they describe the form music takes.  Since you cannot name the ideas music expresses in concrete language I would classify music as an emotional form of art.

Oh, and unfortunately I didn't take classes to understand Russian literature - I just read it. However, one could take classes to understand all sorts of things about different forms of music: the sociocultural background it emerged in, the biography of musicians, music theory, etc. The problem is once you start thinking about music when you listen to it you're automatically lessening its aesthetic impact because you are thinking about all sorts of ancillary concerns rather than just hearing the music for what it is. Knowing about what life is like for people in Niger doesn't effect how I hear Group Inerane. They sound awesome just because they do.

Steve, this is why people get pissed: You basically are telling us that we are lying to ourselves why we enjoy something and that we are soft-headed dumbfucks fooled by fake artists and jive turkeys who spend lots of time and money playing their dastardly tricks on our desperate need to be "cool" and "different."

Well, fuck you, it ain't so.

Maybe you just feel sorry for us, but, my friend, I feel sorry for you. Your capacity for the abstract is like a 6'x6' cell. Chalk up another one.

Erick, nobody's calling you a soft-headed dumbfuck. Sorry if you take it that way. I've got respect for your take on music but I don't agree with where you're coming from a lot of the time.

I do think the Piranhas are jive turkeys though.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: turn_coat on December 26, 2008, 06:49:30 PM
I don't mind Pisces Clangor all that much.  While it's not my favorite Piranhas record I still listen to it on occasion.
I am pretty amused how up in arms people are getting over it.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: grandmaster satch and the bi-curious five on December 26, 2008, 07:05:13 PM
I do think the Piranhas are jive turkeys though.

(http://static.rateyourmusic.com/album_images/336077.jpg)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: CollectorScum on December 26, 2008, 07:47:58 PM
im pretty sure they played again the next year on halloween.

And here are pics from that Halloween show, 2003.  I think this is the only time I seriously took photos while a band played (well, not that serious):

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0344.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0348.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0350.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0351.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0356.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0357.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0358.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0359.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0360.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0362.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0369.jpg)

(http://www.CollectorScum.com/misc/piranhas20031031/PICT0370.jpg)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Tippet on December 26, 2008, 09:38:46 PM
Music doesn't require intellectual engagement because it can be apprehended and appreciated without mental activity. You shouldn't need to think about music because once you start thinking about an aesthetic experience it snaps you out of a direct experience of the art in question and puts you in the secondary realm of analysis. Analysis is great and all, but unless it comes after the fact you aren't able to experience a state of aesthetic arrest where everything drops off save for a feeling of awe and wonder before the grand lines of nature as manifested in a work of art. Instead you're thinking "isn't this great" rather than feeling the "whatness" of the artwork in question. Literature is the only form of art that plays by a different set of rules because by its very nature you need to think about it in order to appreciate it. While there are a lot of linguistic tricks a skilled writer can play with tools like meter, word choice, landscape, etc. that can give a reader the experience of aesthetic arrest, literature remains at its most potent when it deals with the world of abstract ideas which require discourse with the intellect. Therefore I would classify literature as an intellectual form of art.

Music on the other hand is at its most potent when it appeals to emotions. Music cannot convey the types of ideas literature can unless it is in the form of lyrics (which have obvious limitations compared to a novel) because the "ideas" expressed by music are so abstract that they cannot be verbalized. Even concepts like rhythm, melody, meter, pitch, etc. fall short of describing the ideas expressed by music. Rather they describe the form music takes.  Since you cannot name the ideas music expresses in concrete language I would classify music as an emotional form of art.

(http://blogs.nypost.com/popwrap/photos/Statler_Waldorf.jpg)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: dusty medical on December 26, 2008, 11:19:48 PM
Piranhas: GREAT
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 27, 2008, 02:10:53 AM
Knowing about what life is like for people in Niger doesn't effect how I hear Group Inerane. They sound awesome just because they do.

And so do The Piranhas. Thanks for making my point for me.

And all that lit hoohockey you threw out is fucking bullshit. Literature can effect you "emotionally" and music can effect you "intellectually." I love how you like one "weird" and/or "foreign" band and suddenly you are an expert on knowing what the "real" shit is. Everything else is just a con. Or something to be ridiculed because you think it's all intellectualized and some kind of lie. Like, I really need a thesis to understand Ukrainian hip-hop, man. I couldn't possibly "feel it." And neither can they. Uh uh, no fucking way, bro.

How does that straightjacket fit? Snug?

Man, Steve, I appreciate your passion and intellect, but you really enjoy putting the world in a box, eh?


Get laid, tAKE SOME LSD, move out of your Mom's house, etc....
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: frankie teardrop on December 27, 2008, 09:14:47 AM
Here is my personal Piranhas story. When I was in high school (2002/2003), I was at a record store in Ann Arbor (Yeah, Encore!). I walked in the door and saw Jamie flipping through records (with who I assume was his girlfriend or friend). I had no idea who he was, but was taken aback by this dudes "Mega-chops". Anyways, about a month later I heard about the piranhas and dug them a lot. Then, I finally saw a picture of the singer and had a "acid worthy" flashback.

I never saw them though since they always played 21+ places and I didn't have any fake ID connections or people I knew who could get me into shows. Bummer.

one of my favorite bands for sure. Redundant is their best song.

I also remember there was a time on TB when it was very acceptable to totally bash the hell out of Picsis Clangor.

Anybody got a copy of their tour only 12"?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: frankie teardrop on December 27, 2008, 09:15:36 AM
Also, Steve won the argument. Please lock thread.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 27, 2008, 09:53:51 AM
Young Steve's are ravings from a man who can't fathom anyone sincerely liking the Brainbombs, who are about as primal as you can get.  Contradictions abound between his words and his taste, which is all this boils down to. Steve can intellectualize his taste and try to make that the rule all of us need to abide by lest we be called insincere or poseurs. Fine, but his patter comes from the same chicken shit bullshit that keeps him from cutting the apron strings and moving to Japan. Fact is people come to music, lit, art from so many different places including cultural background, parenting, psych quirks, physical differences, education, etc. that there are no hard fast rules about how people perceive or understand things, beyond basic science and even those rules can be compromised. As important is the understanding that life is not static and there for one's interaction with art is not fixed. It is pretty basic to me, but then again I am 86 years old and went though all this mono-minded bullshit when I was a wee lad. Young Steve, time to grow up.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Arturo on December 27, 2008, 09:57:03 AM
Quote
Piranhas ?Erotic Grit Movies? CD/LP
 
I don?t know if anyone else has the guts to say it, so I might as well go ahead: this is actually pretty damn disappointing.  Maybe that disappointment stems from paying over twenty dollars for this in Tokyo last December, but I paid the same for the new Lost Sounds, and I think that is certifiably genius. But this? aw shucks?the worst part is this could have been one of the best albums in ages if they just fucking wrote some more actual songs for the damn thing.  Tracks like ?Girls Like It Too? and ?Madeline? are up there with anything else they?ve done, but the majority of this is simply too wanky and out there for me to get into.  How can half assed art jams like ?The Great Glitter Nest? suffice from the band that wrote ?Future Primitive??  Why did they have to put this shit out?  I?m so confused?
 
Cheap Record You Should Buy Instead Of This:  Fact:  I could have bought the double LP set of the Who?s ?Sell Out? and ?A Quick One:? albums THREE TIMES OVER with what I paid for this CD.  Which would have been sweet, cause then I could have sent one to the Piranhas and show them that when a band wants to get a little bit artsy they don?t necessarily have to abandon catchy, coherent songwriting.  If you don?t already own the ?Quick One? LP and you are even considering buying the sludge fest that is the new Piranhas, you are a real fool?s fool.  Not only that but you have less taste than a room full of tongue amputees. (SS)
(In The Red Records, www.intheredrecords.com)
 
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Arturo on December 27, 2008, 09:58:12 AM
Quote
Piranhas ?Piscis Clangor? 12? EP
I am now fully convinced that the Piranhas should be filed under performance art from here on. I really think you must need to see the incredible (I've been told) live show to get them now, as they've gone pretty far off the deep end musically. The intro either reminds me of the Butthole Surfers, or the backward-speak of the midget in the Black Lodge from "Twin Peaks". Music-wise you get 23 minutes of sound collage, mutant free jazz, art-rock, and just a general racket that sounds largely improvised, all with the pained howling of an animal reciting free verse over it. Difficult listening with occassional flashes of brilliance (though far fewer than on previous records) that still don't permit me to get through half of the record without getting pissed. Maybe that's the point: music to piss people off? Either way, I lost them after "Dictating Machine Service", and I've actually given them some listening effort. I've tried, and I'm not ashamed to say I don't get it, and don't really want to now. I just can't see any reason to listen to this more than once.You should know if this band is for you anymore. (RK)
.........
Quote
Insight trivet gangplow varia
Resuit valetudinarian export brush toe
Remonstrate preterminal villager slice oboe
Fortuity enthuse boathouse headlong lockjaw.

I just wrote that first stanza
Just now, no practice
By consulting random words that
Looked enthralling in
The 1970 paperback edition of
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary
I am T((((a))))lented

It reads like the lyric sheet
To this E.P.
Which sounds like the second album
Which I liked for a couple months
Before I realized that
HEY!
I enjoyed this band much more
When they played it straight
And weren?t hell-bent on playing
The
W! E! I! R! D!
Card
Reminds me of
ALLY SHEEDY
In the Bkfst Clb

She looked cute
When she wore that
Popular chick?s make-up!
Have you seen
MOLLY RINGWALD
These days?
Hotttttttttttttt----.

But anyways
Like the second alb
This contains no real songs
Just (mostly) nonsensical
Snippets
(Snip)
of mish-mashed bygone art-punk
That have nothing to do
With one another
And the lyric sheet
Reads like dumbshit
W! E! I! R! D!
poetry

And poetry is for assholes
And art is for poets
And when is this band going
To revert back to that cool
Black Flag w/ keyboards thing
They had goin??

I will now eat
Cott------age Cheeeeeeeez. (EL)

Quote
I just invented the "cut and paste" technique for use in Microsoft Word. Tip o' the needle don't have the last name Soriano, course. I honestly am not sure if this band is over all our eyes, but explain precisely WHY you like for some reason I continue to listen. Mostly because they have PARTS and PIECES, they were before the break-up. to Mr. Burroughs, of Shit, it's and partially because kinda weird that this is on In the Red, as it doesn't really hit longer than a few seconds, so many cool sounding so fucking amazing pulling the wool so maybe Larry knows the any sorta groove for answer? If you can this, and please send me an email. (TK)
(In the Red Records // www.intheredrecords.com)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Arturo on December 27, 2008, 10:01:02 AM
(and yes i realize stuff can grow on you and opinions can change after time. but its funny to see the initial reaction to these records now.)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: teenagegurls on December 27, 2008, 10:07:31 AM
(http://www.solie.org/bravo.gif)
 - Steve puttin' a-hurtin' on this thread
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Jared on December 27, 2008, 10:17:45 AM
(http://www.solie.org/bravo.gif)
 - Steve puttin' a-hurtin' on this thread

How?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Late Twenties Steve on December 27, 2008, 12:22:55 PM
My whole point isn't that it's impossible for music to stimulate thought - it's that thinking shouldn't be a prerequisite to appreciate music because it opens the doors for all kinds of justifications on why one should like something that isn't sonically appealing. For instance, in my mind I know why "LA Blues" is the perfect culmination of the hellride that is "Funhouse" but that doesn't mean I think it's a "good" song on a strictly sonic level because it's just a bunch of abrasive noise. Some people might be hardwired to actually like the sound of a one way radio transmitting from hell, but my guess is that there are a lot more who talk themselves into appreciating it. If that's the case then does the person enjoy the song itself or are they enjoying a projection of their own thoughts onto the song?

And Erick, I never said literature couldn't effect you emotionally. But you can't apprehend literature without the intellect.

Fact is people come to music, lit, art from so many different places including cultural background, parenting, psych quirks, physical differences, education, etc. that there are no hard fast rules about how people perceive or understand things, beyond basic science and even those rules can be compromised. As important is the understanding that life is not static and there for one's interaction with art is not fixed.

I've got to admit this is pretty well stated and has more than a grain of truth to it. I would expand on it though to add that the differences Scott mentioned account for the formation of people's entire worldview not just how they see music.


Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: dusty medical on December 27, 2008, 12:54:18 PM
anyone have a copy of Erotic Grit Movies on LP to sell?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Jared on December 27, 2008, 01:06:29 PM
Why are you so convinced that people must be tricking themselves into liking difficult things? 
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Late Twenties Steve on December 27, 2008, 01:17:54 PM
Because if they find something difficult it implies they have to "work" to understand and appreciate it. Again, I'm not saying everyone who likes abrasive music does this, but I think a lot do. Whether or not it's the majority there are people who talk themselves into liking things because they think they should. I know because I've talked to friends who have told me so and I used to do it myself. Notice I called the Lost Sounds "genius" in that review up there. Utterly shameful.



Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Jared on December 27, 2008, 01:24:15 PM
But as I'm sure you've experienced, there are also those things that don't click upon first listen, but after a couple more spins they start to become enjoyable, or they start to make sense, and sometimes they even amount to being some of your favorite shit ever.  This doesn't have to have anything to do with "convincing yourself that you should like it".  I'm not denying that this happens to people, and I'm sure I've even fallen prey to it myself, but don't make it seem like it's more widespread than it is.

It also makes me wonder:  if there's stuff out there that people are convincing themselves that they like because they're supposed to according to certain taste makers, then does anybody genuinely like it?  Do you think that the original source of "this is good, check it out" is also convincing themselves that they're "supposed" to like it and is trying to dupe others into liking it along with him in order to not feel so swindled.  I'm not trying to sound condescending, I just don't really get this firm stance of yours.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Richie on December 27, 2008, 01:27:14 PM
I still think Piscis Clangor sucks.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SteveBeat on December 27, 2008, 03:09:09 PM
can't you let young steve remain in his musical ghetto

can't you

can't you let college dork posturing about punk rock go steve

can't you

can you turn up the fucking HEAVY ROCK

can you
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 27, 2008, 03:15:39 PM
I just watched the Hawkwind doc.

(rectal) Space is Deep.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 27, 2008, 03:32:13 PM
Please note that the SS in the abobe review is Young Steve, not Scott Soriano. I'd never write anything that idiotic. Okay, maybe I would, but not about that record.

One more thing, Steve:  Your contention that literature is not immediate is stupid. If literature is story telling, then, yes, it can be immediate. Dostoyevsky is immediate. It is also complex and by complex I dont mean that he writes long books and uses Russian names. Melville is immediate and also complex. You can read either Crime & Punishment or Moby Dick without a guide. If you can't read. You can have someone read it to you and understand it. How deep the understanding depends on what you bring to it. I read C&P for the first time when I was 16. It blew me away. I read it when I was 30 and fourteen years of life and years of studying Russian history and the language gave me a much greater understanding and appreciation of it, but I dont think it blew me away any more than when I was a wee brained lad. That is what great art is about. Finnegan's Wake is a great book. When Joyce wrote it, he joked that he would have academics arguing about what it meant while the common Irishman, reading it aloud to each other would get the humor and word play, and thus the meaning, or at least the basic meaning of the book. The book was meant to be read aloud and its main audience was the Irish, so in that context it is neither complex or difficult. It is immediate and was designed to be.

Music is the same. Chopin, Monk, Cage, James Brown are all complex and immediate and one does not get in the way of the other. Plenty of Indian classical music or Arab music or gamelon sounds complex to people who aren't atune to the music, but it isnt. You like Group Innare because you can understand it within a rock & roll context. You would probably have more of a problem with Hazma al Din, who is less complex and more immediate than Group I. But it is very traditional and not based on Western musical concepts.

I dont like the distinction between high art and low art. To me it is too class oriented, but I do think there is a difference between a high level of artisticness and a low level. To me the highest level is to make the complex immediate and not only make the creation of it seem effortless but the experience of it can be effortless as well. It is also one that takes time and effort to fully appreciate. Get years in and you realize that Moby Dick is one of the funniest books ever written, something you wont get when you read excerpts in high school or the whole thing in an American Lit class. None of this means that GG Allin or the Simpletones arent great listening or that Harry Whittington aint worth tracking down or that there is no merit to Attack of the Killer Tomatos. Ultimately it comes down to what you enjoy. And I and others enjoy late Piranhas for a bunch of different things and for different reasons (I'd say the two primary ones are blind energy and free imagination, two things not high on your pop-sensible list....and that is fine). To us, it is obvious that they are immediate. Not to you. Your head isnt there. Your heart isnt there. Maybe it will get there. Maybe you arent wired for it. I am 86 years old, 350 pounds and 4'6" yet I still like to shoot some hoop. It will never be effortless or very pretty, and because of my age, size, and stature I might not be able to appreciate basketball like Michael Jordan or Kobe Rapist can, but I still like it. I am not sure what that means but it seems like a good way to end this babble. 
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 27, 2008, 03:56:22 PM
I still think Piscis Clangor sucks.

Sure.

And I always thought that Lastname review was hilarious, even though I completely disagree with it.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: icki on December 27, 2008, 04:25:37 PM
I'd like to interrupt this thread and encourage everyone to buy a copy of the Druid Perfume LP!

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2156/2967302339_4140700992_m.jpg)


Okay, back to the messageboard intellectualizing.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 27, 2008, 05:05:36 PM
It was all a ruse! Sell them bitches, Icki!

This is my red book
This is my history book
Therefore: all history books are red

This is my cat
My cat is black
Therefore: all cats are black
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: turn_coat on December 27, 2008, 05:21:08 PM
I'd like to interrupt this thread and encourage everyone to buy a copy of the Druid Perfume LP!

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2156/2967302339_4140700992_m.jpg)


Okay, back to the messageboard intellectualizing.

Does the band have any?  I've been waiting to pick one up from them on New Years Eve.





I wasted like an hour and half today trying to upload a Piranhas live set to just to post it in this thread, only to find out the file was too big for Mediafire.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: kevjones on December 27, 2008, 06:10:41 PM
I'd like to interrupt this thread and encourage everyone to buy a copy of the Druid Perfume LP!

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2156/2967302339_4140700992_m.jpg)


Okay, back to the messageboard intellectualizing.


Is that a huge, flacid penis at the top?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: icki on December 27, 2008, 06:13:18 PM

Does the band have any?  I've been waiting to pick one up from them on New Years Eve.


I wasted like an hour and half today trying to upload a Piranhas live set to just to post it in this thread, only to find out the file was too big for Mediafire.

Yeah, the band has copies and will have them at the New Years show. They should also have copies of their new 7" on Italy.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: sarim on December 27, 2008, 06:22:16 PM
erick hughes and his silly gism

shes a witch
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: I Am Not Marty Feldman on December 27, 2008, 06:42:33 PM
Music and literature are not completely separate.  Rhythm. 
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: turn_coat on December 27, 2008, 06:47:11 PM
Video of Piranhas live in 2004 at the Lager House in Detroit.  A Frames also played that night. (http://www.megaupload.com/?d=61UOWK3N)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: I Am Not Marty Feldman on December 27, 2008, 06:57:50 PM
Also, I still think that record sucks.  Think I finally solid it when I moved a few months ago.  Revisited it quite a few times and it just never clicked.  Ho hum.

I liked bits of Picis Clangor.  Haven't heard it in awhile, but I'd probably like it more now.  I remember "My Shoes" being a good bit o' glop-punk.

I dunno.  More and more what excites me about music is unpredictability -- in the music itself, sure, but also in taste.  Too many motherfuckers trying to present their record-buying tendencies as art these days.  "Here is my aesthetic.  I am a power-pop/'70s rock/soul/garage guy."  Boring.  Loathesome.  Way to take one of the only avenues of personal freedom and turn it into another dead-ender.  Blah-de-blah. 

Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Tippet on December 27, 2008, 07:13:59 PM
Hey, if any PIRANHA HATERS want to sell me their early non-ITR recs they should give me a PM.

Threads like these make me love them twice as much.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: DJ Rick on December 27, 2008, 07:18:56 PM
Knowing about what life is like for people in Niger doesn't effect how I hear Group Inerane. They sound awesome just because they do.

Whoa, I just caught this finally. I know we've had the whole band geography debate so many times, but...

"Because they sound awesome" is certainly a good enough reason to like Group Inerane. But, do you really know how much life SUCKS in Niger? Probably no one in North America does...not even the northernmost Inuits in Nunavut do. And when's the last time you heard a rad band from even mainland Nunavut? I heard some field recordings the other day from Darfur (somewhere we all know is sucky thanks to bumper stickers and t-shirts worn by celebrities) on some radio documentary, and although it sounded fairly "generic" as far as African folk traditions go, it was pretty magical to hear how the chants ended in laughter. When it comes to places as ravaged as most African nations--where the only scenes we ever see are ribcages, oozing sores, dozens of flies per pair of lips, etc.--it is truly a miracle of the human fucking spirit to wanna do anything besides sulk or curl up and die, let alone form a totally rad band that made an incredible album.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Late Twenties Steve on December 27, 2008, 11:45:36 PM
Knowing about what life is like for people in Niger doesn't effect how I hear Group Inerane. They sound awesome just because they do.

Whoa, I just caught this finally. I know we've had the whole band geography debate so many times, but...

"Because they sound awesome" is certainly a good enough reason to like Group Inerane. But, do you really know how much life SUCKS in Niger? Probably no one in North America does...not even the northernmost Inuits in Nunavut do. And when's the last time you heard a rad band from even mainland Nunavut? I heard some field recordings the other day from Darfur (somewhere we all know is sucky thanks to bumper stickers and t-shirts worn by celebrities) on some radio documentary, and although it sounded fairly "generic" as far as African folk traditions go, it was pretty magical to hear how the chants ended in laughter. When it comes to places as ravaged as most African nations--where the only scenes we ever see are ribcages, oozing sores, dozens of flies per pair of lips, etc.--it is truly a miracle of the human fucking spirit to wanna do anything besides sulk or curl up and die, let alone form a totally rad band that made an incredible album.

I don't disagree with anything you wrote, but I personally believe the experience of music is at its purest and best when you aren't thinking about those external concerns. Of course it's fine to take a band's background into account in a biographical sense, but I don't like thinking about a band's background when listening to their music. For me thinking about this kind of thing is no different than thinking about Keith Moon running over his driver in a drunken stupor whenever I hear his brilliant drumming. The genius of his drumming was linked to his reckless nature, but why ruin a great musical experience by dwelling on biography. I'd get sick listening to Gary Glitter if I thought about what kind of person he is (although I can't listen to White Boy since I heard about them in connection to Mr. Ott being a child molester). When you heard those Darfur recordings which you describe as run of the mill for African music it sounds like what was having an effect on you was thinking about the band's story, not the music itself. Of course it's uplifting to hear laughter amidst inconceivable suffering, but when you hear the music with its background in mind you're projecting your own feelings onto the song - ie what you imagine it would be like for people living in conditions more horrible than most of us can come close to approximating in our imaginations. There's nothing inherently wrong with this but it's not the music itself that evokes a reaction, rather it's what you're thinking about it.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: DJ Rick on December 28, 2008, 01:42:57 AM

All listen and no wonder makes Steve Spock a joyless music consumer.

So many people born in the 80s and 90s who only have mp3s and hardly even buy any CDs. That sleeve art and liner info would only pollute these kids' minds, and we can't have that because they are certainly the shrewdest listeners on earth, as you can tell by their entire CD collection consisting of Now That's What I Call Music vols. 20-24.

You should raid Kool Herc's and Afrika Bambaataa's warehouses fulla records that they soaked the inner label off of in the 70s to keep their breaks secret from other DJs. Would those sorrowfully defaced records be worth as much to you?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Richie on December 28, 2008, 10:38:16 AM
NOW LOOK WHAT YOU GUYS DID!

STEVE, COME BACK!

DON'T LET THESE CHIN-STROKERS WIN!




Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Jared on December 28, 2008, 12:05:51 PM
Damn it!  Now who am I going to argue with?


Steeeeeve, come baaaaaack!!
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 28, 2008, 01:59:12 PM
Dear Young Steve -

You can check out anytime you like,
but you but you can never leave.

The Management
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 28, 2008, 02:05:44 PM
human fucking spirit

Damn, dude, you made DJ Rick curse. That's some fucked up shit.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 28, 2008, 02:08:29 PM
erick hughes and his silly gism

shes a witch

What the hell does this mean? I'mma fuck you up tomorrow.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 28, 2008, 02:13:34 PM
It means that every time he wants your cum to get serious, it cracks a stupid joke.
"Look at me! I'm anal mayo!" 
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 28, 2008, 02:21:19 PM
Christ:

Steve, since you deleted yr account I cannot reply to your PM, so here ya go.

I don't dislike you AT ALL. I actually enjoy arguing about this stupid shit. It's just a matter of personal taste, I think we all know that. I apologize if I have personally insulted you, but considering you air a fair amount of your personal life on here, then I feel like it's semi-open to discussion (like telling you to move out of Mom's house or whatever). I DO find your aesthetic preferences incredibly perplexing and I do think that you lash out at things you do not understand in a sort of blind, almost xenophobic (if I may twist that word's meaning a bit) and it does get me riled up, but I don't take it personally in any sort of permanent way. It's fun to get pissed off and argue with someone about stupid-ass punk rock music. And, as a side note, this entire discussion is not really about the Piranhas at all. I thought we all knew that.

Finally, the mental illness shit is hard to explain. Perhaps you just phrased your thought badly. But I completely disagree with it, particularly this notion of "reaL' craziness vs. "fake" craziness in any sort of judging of a piece of art's worthiness. Most of us are interested in the back-story, whether we admit it or not, as long as that doesn't become the sole determinate of value.

Shit, man, you got me writing like an asshole. Thanks a lot.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Radio Heartbeat on December 28, 2008, 02:31:16 PM
I can't believe Steve lost at TOTAL WAR.

I've always been a Steve fan, even though he's wrong a lot. I stick by Neutral Spirits.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: vint on December 28, 2008, 02:32:36 PM
I appreciate Steve's rants, even though I think he's completely off on many of them. One of the more interesting characters on this thing though. Come back.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: panama fist on December 28, 2008, 02:48:59 PM
steve,
i listened to boys club and piranhas back to back today in a total war experiment. boys club made me do a little jig and play air guitar, piranhas gave me a headache and are now in the to sell pile. come back.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 28, 2008, 02:51:44 PM
I will second Erick's blurb about nothing personal, airing personal info, etc. but as I advised Young Steve last time he flamed out, better to back from the precipice than let this board consume him because he is attaching a level of meaning to this thing far greater than it deserves.

I will say though, that the thing that gets me riled is that Young Steve's rants are a series of restrictions: You cant be sincere in your liking of ____, this can't hit you in the gut, exploration can only be done in a content that I (Young Steve) understands otherwise it is not valid. If that is his personal credo, fine. It leads to a less satisfying more stifled life but it is his life. However to prescribe his tastes and fear/insecurity based rules as the one true way is idiotic and, to me, an invitation to attack. And to use one's own life and experience and received wisdom as the only way to measure somethings worth, without the out of "I just dont understand, so I'll let it be" is fucked up. That is what fundamentalists do. It isnt right because it seeks to deny me the freedom to appreciate things on my own terms. But I do understand, partially, where Young Steve is coming from, as there are various times in my life that I've rejected some form or music or a band because I didnt understand it, it didnt hit me directly, or I was clinging on to some received wisdom that said this or that sucks. If I continued on that way I would have never listened to VU (hippies), Fugs (hippies), Wire's Chairs Missing (not the direct impact of Pink Flag), any jazz (thanks to reacting to received wisdom of jr high music teachers), and dozens of bands who "weren't punk". Stupid way to go through life. 
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Marko on December 28, 2008, 02:54:21 PM
Come back Steve!

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/152/435225311_83213bffe8_b.jpg)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 28, 2008, 02:55:14 PM
Ha!
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: icki on December 28, 2008, 03:20:24 PM
Come back Steve!

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/152/435225311_83213bffe8_b.jpg)


Brilliant.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: almost ready records on December 28, 2008, 03:20:57 PM
GET BACK!  DON'T LET THE T-B GRIND YA DOWN.  FUCK THE HATERS.  


Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 28, 2008, 03:56:01 PM
attaching a level of meaning to this thing far greater than it deserves.

True dat.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 28, 2008, 03:58:58 PM
Also:

DBPBB

(Don't Be a Plastic Bag Baby)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: frankie teardrop on December 28, 2008, 04:00:44 PM
WWPBBD

What Would Plastic Bag Baby Do?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 28, 2008, 04:07:30 PM
WWPBBD

What Would Plastic Bag Baby Do?

Cry and call me a butthugger or something like that.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: bazooka joe on December 28, 2008, 04:49:29 PM
i've really enjoyed reading all of your perspectives on this subject. i wish i could articulate my thoughts as well as some of you. truth is though that steve did lose the total war (partly because his initial assesment of the piranhas as a band that people fool themselves into liking is ridiculous- just cuz i think it's kinda fake doens't mean that someone else isn't gonna get something more meaningful out of it [did i just contradict my whole general attitude about music?] and mostly because quitting termbo is really pussy- he practically lives here- grow a pair!). and on that note, pisces clangor really isn't that exciting. i liked their 1st album much better. the skronkiness of p.c. seems contrived to my ears. sure does look cool in my collection though. HAR!
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Claire Dactyl on December 28, 2008, 04:51:23 PM
Does this mean I'm allowed to feel okay again about the fact that I have an ass?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 28, 2008, 06:02:46 PM
We should all be OK about having asses. Can you imagine shitting out of your belly button?
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 28, 2008, 06:04:47 PM
it would be easier to insert a serving spout in your belly button.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 28, 2008, 06:06:38 PM
People were talking about the ghost where I work the other day and I had a vision of spirits crawling out of the toilet right up your asshole, possessing you from the guts on up.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: SSR on December 28, 2008, 06:14:43 PM
Ass Ghost

(http://b9.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/00016/95/50/16060559_s.jpg)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: grandmaster satch and the bi-curious five on December 28, 2008, 06:26:38 PM

All listen and no wonder makes Steve Spock a joyless music consumer.



with a groovy medalion and shades!

(http://slantmouth.com/articles/eruptionImminent/images/spock.jpg)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: grandmaster satch and the bi-curious five on December 28, 2008, 06:28:56 PM
steve spock...

(http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b341/jeffbotsaz/spock_smoke.jpg)

(http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/memoryalpha/en/images/f/f2/SpockLosesControlOnPlatoniu.jpg)

(http://trekmovie.com/wp-content/uploads/amoktime/kirk_smiley_spock.jpg)

(http://www.phildo.org/images/spock-jimi.jpg)

(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t6/car4dave/bkimages/starkink.jpg)

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/22/31549199_eca92eba92.jpg?v=0)



ON WEED!
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Scrod Prickknee on December 28, 2008, 07:45:03 PM
I still think Piscis Clangor sucks.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: erickelric on December 28, 2008, 08:52:10 PM
So I googled "rectal depth" and this came up #1.

Number two was headlined "Are cowboy hats a rectal depth spot?"
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: sarim on December 29, 2008, 01:47:25 AM
erick hughes and his silly gism

shes a witch

What the hell does this mean? I'mma fuck you up tomorrow.

ericks a dude
steves a dude
erick is steve



"my advice to you would be is to pay attention to me"
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: teenagegurls on December 29, 2008, 08:32:52 AM

edgy band of loud noise makers (with haircuts) pour one out for dey homie, steve.

(http://www.thejerkreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/pour_one_out.jpg)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Vince Clortho Keymaster of Gozac on December 29, 2008, 08:35:58 AM
That guy with the hat on looks like this guy I know with one of the best sXe tattoos I've ever seen.

Also, is Steve back yet or what???
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Jared on December 29, 2008, 09:15:24 AM
WWPBBD

What Would Plastic Bag Baby Do?

Cry and call me a butthugger or something like that.

No no, it was "bumboy".
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Vince Clortho Keymaster of Gozac on December 29, 2008, 09:38:03 AM
More.Suicides.Please is actually PBB.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: griffith on December 29, 2008, 10:05:08 AM
WWPBBD

What Would Plastic Bag Baby Do?

Cry and call me a butthugger or something like that.

No no, it was "bumboy".

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: DJ Rick on December 29, 2008, 10:08:19 AM
ericks a dude
steves a dude
erick is steve

I felt a "Goodburger" joke coming on for a second there.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: ZombieAppetizer on December 29, 2008, 10:10:59 AM
Best of luck in the non-TB world Steve!
Enjoy the JT IV DVD+insert I mailed you.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Mitch on December 29, 2008, 10:24:22 AM
SteeeeeeEEEEvvvve!  Don't go!

I officially take back everything.  I HATE THE PIRANHAS!!!
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: teenagegurls on December 29, 2008, 10:41:49 AM

I Don't Care What They Say I Won't Stay
In A World Without Steve!
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: DJ Rick on December 29, 2008, 10:50:28 AM

Who will I have persnickety vocabulary wars and pedantry squabbles with now???
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: sarim on December 29, 2008, 12:08:26 PM
rick, please feel free

collin, whered you get that picture? i could swear i know the dude in the middle.

steve, i think you might find some guidance here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvZSdCTcS-A
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: teenagegurls on December 29, 2008, 12:32:28 PM
rick, please feel free

collin, whered you get that picture? i could swear i know the dude in the middle.

steve, i think you might find some guidance here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvZSdCTcS-A

Sarim, google 'pour one out' and it's the first thing that pops up.  where were you?  looks like you missed a rockin' party.

(http://www.cinemas-online.co.uk/films/goodburg/logo.jpg)
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: icki on December 29, 2008, 01:00:30 PM
And "Piscis Clanger" still sucks.  It's not that I have my own individual taste that may not parallel yours.  It's because IT SUCKS.


YES! Let the fighting begin, again!
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Raul on December 31, 2008, 07:07:53 AM
for sure that it sucks, i heard it yesterday. there are no way that i can get into that album. i put then the on/on LP. they were a bunch of fuckers on that days.. fuckin brilliant, perfect
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Jared on December 31, 2008, 09:15:47 AM
Raul you should write poetry.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Whet Bull on December 31, 2008, 11:22:05 AM
Welcome back to here, hey Raul!
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas
Post by: Damn on January 11, 2010, 09:37:55 AM
Video of Piranhas live in 2004 at the Lager House in Detroit.  A Frames also played that night. (http://www.megaupload.com/?d=61UOWK3N)

ha! still up! cool! does a video of the a-frames set exist too?

and yeah, sick thread, dudes.
Title: Re: RECTAL DEPTH: Young Steve vs. Piranhas (PS: fuck DJ RICK)
Post by: Whet Bull on January 11, 2010, 09:47:10 AM
Rectal Depth needs to be the name of a band. Some shitty power electronics/grind combo.