terminal-boredom.com

Terminal Boardumb => Music Shit => Pop Punk => Topic started by: abusive_husband on February 21, 2010, 10:58:01 AM

Title: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: abusive_husband on February 21, 2010, 10:58:01 AM
Blank Dogs?

Ganglians?

Thee Oh Sees?
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Vince Clortho Keymaster of Gozac on February 21, 2010, 10:59:32 AM
It will look like Eric Lastname and sound like Jerry Cantrell solo.
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Whet Bull on February 21, 2010, 11:13:56 AM
That's a tuff one, I dunno.  Let's call it... wnkrs. 
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Damn on February 21, 2010, 12:52:35 PM
the beets obviously. their name is a negative of "The Beatles". hope they disbanded so their existence is negative too.
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: HIV Playground on February 21, 2010, 01:36:32 PM
Lady Gaga
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: southern steve on February 21, 2010, 06:08:38 PM
I'm hoping Oasis will be the Ramones of the 2010s. That way, three of them will die. 
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Jared on February 21, 2010, 06:21:32 PM
I'm hoping Oasis will be the Ramones of the 2010s. That way, three of them will die. 

I got news for ya - they will all die.
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: southern steve on February 21, 2010, 06:39:12 PM
I meant soon.
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Marko on February 22, 2010, 10:16:05 AM
The Wifebeatles
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: kingdown on February 22, 2010, 01:56:15 PM
i think you mean the mercy wife beaters
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: TheKLYAM on February 22, 2010, 04:00:21 PM
nobunny
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Whet Bull on February 26, 2010, 07:48:33 AM
I meant soon.

That's not very nice.  Why would you wish death upon the Gallagher brothers and their shitty, anonymous rhythm section?  They're people just like you and me, with family and friends who love and depend upon them.  Would there deaths cleanse the taste of "Wonderwall" or "Don't Look Back in Anger" from our palette?  If anything, it would make those songs more ubiquitous. 
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: southern steve on February 26, 2010, 08:44:37 AM
That would be worth it just so long as the death was sufficiently painful.

Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Neat! on February 27, 2010, 01:50:20 PM
now that they have reunited i place my bets on alice in chains! or masshysteri
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: #1 Grammar Champ on March 06, 2010, 12:13:54 AM
psychedelic horseshit
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: allergictofun on March 06, 2010, 12:40:28 AM
if you mean 'tasteful', mass-apprecitated music, I fear that it will be fleet foxes or wilco, or more likely radiohead unfortunately. but if you mean bands that make at least one  solid album every year for ten years, that's wide open. We've got plenty of prolificacy, but real, sustained quality? Hmmm. I would like it to be home blitz or so cow. Wait, I have already put too much time into this question. This is dumb.
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: CreamOfWheat on March 06, 2010, 12:43:11 AM
We're still working on a second Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Who's that gonna be?
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Damn on March 06, 2010, 09:03:33 AM
I fear that it will be fleet foxes or wilco, or more likely radiohead unfortunately.

this is confusing me. do you mean this like if these bands disbanded they could become "what the beatles became in the 70s" of the 2010s?
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: abusive_husband on March 07, 2010, 06:31:37 AM
I fear that it will be fleet foxes or wilco, or more likely radiohead unfortunately.

this is confusing me. do you mean this like if these bands disbanded they could become "what the beatles became in the 70s" of the 2010s?

LOCK THREAD
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: polk biggins on March 16, 2010, 10:23:26 AM
ringo deathstarr?
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: illuminations on March 17, 2010, 08:15:55 PM
The Beatles, although on projectors, Gorillaz style. They will all look like they did in 1968.

Thee Oh Sees--would be great. I like how they are always, always writing new songs. No matter what happens, I hope their winning streak continues. But will they have much popular recognition? No.

Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Der Diggler on March 19, 2010, 09:22:24 PM
Jay Reatard is the John Lennon of 2010 so I guess that would have to make it the Reatards......nah thats too obvious. I would say the Beatles are the Beatles of 2010.
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: tango fistula on March 20, 2010, 12:15:15 PM
Jay Reatard is the John Lennon of 2010

So...He was only good when he had a band with a bullshit detector in it?
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Mark Beef on March 20, 2010, 12:22:09 PM
I didn't think these threads could get any stupider but then

BAM!!!

second encore
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: okkame on March 21, 2010, 08:45:05 PM
The Fresh & Onlys. though i'm not that into their music.
Title: Re: Who will be The Beatles of the 2010s?
Post by: Damn on March 24, 2010, 01:33:24 PM
LOCK THREAD