1
Non-Music Shit / Re: humidifier bad for records?
« on: December 27, 2011, 07:52:19 PM »
you'll be fine. i had to do this and i had mine on all the time. no big deal at all. records were not affected one bit. crank it!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
)was going to press at United, but is it worth it to send to Prairie Cat and have him send the lacquers?
looks like i can save a few bucks
Last time I checked I thought it actually added a few bucks to send it to directly to the person to do the lacquers, but I would say, yes, do that for sure, even if it ends up costing a bit more as that way you can have direct contact with that person and if something goes wrong with the tests or final product it'll be easier to see who messed up and both sides won't be blaming each other.
is it totally shitty to press a 7" at 33? I've heard people gripe about it, but i own a good deal of 7"s at 33 and sound ok to me. are these people purists? what's the deal?
It is not about RPMs as much as it is about time. Vinyl has an infinite amount of space, which is why you only can put so much time on one side of a record. The more time you put on a record the smaller the grooves are. There becomes a point where the grooves get so small that audio quality deteriorates. With 33 rpm (on 7" or 12") you are able to put more time on a record because the record spins slower. With a 7" you can go up to 3 minutes at 45 before quality drops off, though most people won't hear it til it hits 4:30+ min. At 33, you can go to about 4:30 before quality drops off, but you wont notice til about 6. One thing you will notice is that 33 rpm 7"s are generally quieter than 45s. You will also notice that 12"s at 45 are really loud (which is why dance/DJ 12"s are mastered at 45).
locked keys in car, $160 later, worst day ever.