I didn
So...when is this "craze" gonna be over?
You do yourself a disservice thinking of any style of music as a "craze" or a "fad", especially if it is something you dont like or understand. I also think you fuck yourself by thinking that punk has some rigid structure or stylistic rules. My idea of punk is far broader than your's. It does include Tyvek and Druid Perfume. In fact, I think of those two bands are more in the spirit of punk than the Carbonas or any hardcore revival band, as I think staying static and accepting things as they are - and in this case things means musical styles/templates - isn't challenging, especially when the 1-2-3-4 punk sound is so accepted that the style is used in TV commercials and as bumper music on mainstream talk radio shows. Really, I dont think punk was meant to be safe or lazy or even nostalgic. Who wants a punk Sha-na-na? (Okay, we all do but you know what I mean.)
I think MRR has gotten a bit better over the last year or so since they've widened their coverage to include something more than patch bands. However I also think that 20% is being very generous. Musically MRR is very conservative and, until recently, has adhered to a very restrictive definition of punk.
Hey I didn't call it a craze...i just repeated it. I was being tongue-in-cheek when I started this thread. I've think punk is a lot broader than you give me credit for....but to be a style or genre of music, I also belive that it does have boundaries and styles. To define it as a style of music, there must be a point of experimentation where something ceases to be punk. Who cares though? I guess I just have to wait until thisshit passes, and maybe the next thing to come along will be a little more exciting...
MRR has never been all patch bands...there has always been that 10 - 30% coverage of decent stuff. Like I said, that's better than most other magazines have done in the past few years.