46
Non-Music Shit / Re: Lolita: Go.
« on: April 01, 2018, 10:03:50 AM »Sorry i wrote that kinda drunk. But yeah I tried to read Ada and i got maybe 300 pages in. It's confusing, his language is...abstract in a way i can't describe. I don't know where my copy is, will have to go re-read. But no I was just commenting on how that subject comes up A LOT in his work. I like Anais Nin a lot too and man. House of Incest. That book is brutal.
Also if you read Lolita an also enjoyed the works of Louis Carrol you may find yourself questioning the idea of what it really means to be a child. That is an idea Nabokov toyed with a lot in his work Ana or Adore is a very confusing novel honestly and the length in which it deals with the ideas of "family". His work has sent me in so many directions because looking for answers. He is a prime example of someone who was quite frankly veru skeptical of humanity as a whole. And what he said was what he meant but the way in which he said it is just so damm misunderstood by americans.
The title is "Ada, or Ardor." Have you read it?
I'm not sure Nabokov was so misunderstood by Americans. Where is the evidence of this? More people have seen the film than have read the book, and the film is famously different.
I don't think the reader is meant to sympathize with Humbert, who is a pederast and a rapist (also, not French). The game he plays is making Humbert very funny and, according to Humbert himself, very charming. But you only see the story from Humbert's point of view, so you never know the truth of what happened. Humbert is writing from prison, or Hell, and the novel is his apologia or justification. We never hear from Lolita herself, poor thing. You misread Lolita if you conflate Nabokov with Humbert, which you seem to do by likening N to Lewis Carroll, who supposedly was a pederast in life,, which N was not.

Home
Help
Search
Login
Register


