21
« on: October 17, 2014, 05:04:30 AM »
Disbelief is most easily suspended when the plot is a small variation on reality. What I thought (think) is great about this show is that it makes fiction out of something that I instinctively subscribe to - small power structures run the world, more or less secretively, i.e. the basis of the plot is how I instinctively perceive the world around me. The big choices made both in our world (eg. Iraq) and in Utopia (eg. Russian flu, population control) require suspension of quotidian morality. Milner addresses this in a conversation with Wilson in ep 5 or 6. But Wilson's partnership with his former torturer isn't amoral or convenient - it's the opposite, it's deeply moral, because he is deeply moral and a believer in the cause. His former torturer tells him that every time Wilson threatens him with violence. It's a historical and literary trope - the idealist is compromised once placed in a position of enacting ideals. While Wilson's internal battle around taking life and compromises of his own morality that he must make in pursuit of the ideal is interesting, what I'm saying is that he seems an unlikely candidate for the role in the first place. Out of all the cold, intelligent, powerful establishment figures to choose as Milner's replacement, an indecisive, self-questioning, emotional, one-eyed loony seems unlikely. I actually find most of the remainder of the plot very easy to digest and consistent, and it resonates with me as reality +/- 20-30%, if you catch my drift.