It really seems to matter to the players on a team that someone be the annointed one, the reassuring CLOSER.
But look at the Marlins. They just threw 27 mil at Heath Bell. Cishek is now the closer, putting up pretty much the line Bell has been accomplishing the last three years. The only time a closer truly matters is in the playoffs. And even then, they only "matter" when they fuck up. Think about it. It's every pitcher's job to get hitters out, does it matter where they are in the fucking bullpen pecking order? DO YOUR JOB. GET THE HITTERS OUT. Whoever is best-est at making hitters sad should be the closer, whoever that is in any given week. But teams feel duty bound to give the ninth inning to the CLOSER, even in a tie game.
Break the closer myth. It's superstitious programmatic bullshit.
It's all the fault of the "save," which is the worst stat in baseball--even worse than wins and RBI since it has such a tangible negative impact on the game.
The best reliever shouldn't pitch the ninth--they should pitch in the most important situation of the game. 7th inning, two runners on, nobody out, 1 run lead, heart of the order due up? Use your best reliever. There's no point in saving your best guy for the 9th if you get there without a lead.
The same goes for "closers" not pitching until it's a save situation in extra inning games on the road. The concept that your best reliever can only pitch if it's the last half inning of a game in which you have a lead of 3 runs or less is utterly mind-boggling. It is perhaps the most frustrating part of traditional baseball logic to me.