Excellent. Thanks for the info. We are pretty much going to mix digitally and then bounce the finished product to tape...then tweak digitally until we get a sound we like considering what tape adds or takes away (or at least that is my plan.) From what I'm reading we can expect some more punch to bass and drums which would be great.
I know Garageband gets a bad rap, but I'm not sure what the beef is about if you're recording all live instruments...it's been super easy and fun for our first time doing it. The immediacy of being able to take something from a kernal of an idea to an actual song in a matter of an hour or so (if you're determined) and see if that idea is worth a damn is pretty fucking cool in my opinion.
I'm curious as to why you wanna do it this way as I think you get better results recording things in analog first and then throwing it at your computer afterwards. I like the nerd talk. As far as grievances about garageband are concerned, I figure whatever you feel most comfortable using is what you should go with cuz ultimately it depends more on what you can do with it versus what it offers that makes the biggest difference, and it all boils down to how good your soundcard and d/a converter are anyway. Right now I am all computer based cuz any analog equipment I had needed to go towards funding the blackhole of rent and bills. I have an emu 1919m and soundcard with the ever so awesome UAD card and plug-ins. That UAD stuff is insanely good, highly recommended. I use the hell out of the LA2A and Pultec emulator plugins and they sound so good. If I ever have the money for it I am throwing it at the hardware versions of those things without even flinching. I use Sonar as my DAW, just cuz it's what I'm most comfortable with. NERD TALK.