Author Topic: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull  (Read 18855 times)

pebbles pete

  • Guest
Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« on: July 14, 2008, 05:21:52 PM »
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/51539-eat-skull-sick-to-death

Eat Skull:
Sick to Death
[Siltbreeze; 2008]
Rating: 8.3

On their first album Sick to Death, the Portland, Ore., band Eat Skull mashes together almost everything that's great about trashy art-punk, weirdo fuzz-garage, skuzzy punk-pop, Kiwi garage-rock and off-kilter bedroom-strum. If you adore the weird songs on the Not So Quiet on the Western Front album as well as the Urinals, Raincoats, Gordons, Swell Maps, Homosexuals, Tronics, Desperate Bicycles, Television Personalities, Axemen, Guided by Voices, Chain Gang, those Messthetics comps, and very early Pavement, then meet your new favorite band. You should know, though, that this record sounds like it was mastered by a deaf person. It's all super-distorted and in the red; even the "folksy" numbers are louder than fuck. But once your ears adjust, you realize that it's all killer, no filler.

Lots of acts are mining similar territory these days. To name the most obvious adherents, Sic Alps, Times New Viking, Psychedelic Horseshit, No Age, and Tyvek have each hit upon their own twisted formula for reinventing noisy art-pop. For some reason, all these groups have decided that the best way to record is if all your songs sound like they were taped on a thrift-store answering machine using its built-in condenser mic, in a tiled bathroom, when you're really high. Was there some sort of convention held where it was decided this is how records are supposed to sound now? Does Tom Lax of Siltbreeze have nude photos he'll release of all these band people if they ever set foot inside a proper studio? And who came up with the "shitcore"/ "CLOWNING ON BITCHES" term for this stuff? That's the silliest thing I've ever heard. I personally wouldn't mind being able to hear more of what's going on in some of these songs-- ironically, you can catch the distinct parts of the music way better when you go see these bands live.

Arguing against this approach is useless, and if I do it any more I'll turn into Andy Rooney. You might as well walk up to your favorite Scandinavian death metal act and asking them to please write paeans to puppy dogs. Some things are just genre conventions, and you deal: in this corner you get songs about burning churches, and in the other you have more distortion and hiss than Slay Tracks. You'll notice I have not yet used the phrase "lo-fi" in this review. That's because I greatly dislike that term. In its 1980s/90s heyday, "lo-fi" referred to such a wide variety of acts-- Daniel Johnston, Dead C, Sebadoh, Supreme Dicks, Grifters-- that it was functionally useless right from the start. At most, "lo-fi" defines an alleged method of capturing sound, similar to the way that "indie rock" refers to a supposed distribution method and nothing else (aside from "rock"). I am reminded of Jean Dubuffet's quote, that "there is no art of the insane any more than there is an art of dyspeptics, or an art of people with knee complaints." Um, but I digress.

Unlike the current army of Anglophiles rocking the basements across the land, this quartet is as in love with American punk as they are the Commonwealth stuff. They shamble into a muffled memory of U.S. hardcore on songs like the Nervous Gender-ific "Beach Brains" or the wonderfully incomprehensible "Stress Crazy". But there's a surprising amount of variation between sounds and songs on Sick to Death; at times it seems like a various artists comp rather than one band. Here they are channeling GBV and the TVPs on the acoustic lament "New Confinement", while "Puker Corpse" is what the Gun Club would have sounded like if they only made soundtracks to haunted houses. The organ-driven shoutalong "Punk Trips" is a glorious pop song that pits multiple melodic hooks against one another, each of them competing for your heart. I dare you to not get it stuck in your head for days.

MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/eatskull
MP3: Eat Skull: Shredders on Fry
- Mike McGonigal, July 14, 2008

proofrock

  • Pseudointellectual
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 114
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2008, 06:13:17 PM »
Nearly two months after my own review, with like a fraction of the thoughtfulness and relevance. McGonigal knows better than to shit 'em out so disposably. I'm disappointed in Pitchfork.

TTT

  • Most Valuable Primate
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5239
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2008, 06:17:23 PM »
whoa i smell a re-run thread!  call "point!" when somebody re-hashes a line or idea.

but yeah me too.  "im dissapointed in pitchfork".

TTT

  • Most Valuable Primate
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5239
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2008, 06:17:49 PM »
"im dissapointed in pitchfork".

POINT!

griffith

  • Guest
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2008, 06:23:19 PM »
Nearly two months after my own review, with like a fraction of the thoughtfulness and relevance. McGonigal knows better than to shit 'em out so disposably. I'm disappointed in Pitchfork.

Par for the course for Pitchfork and you are wrong about McGonigal. This turgid spew is typical of his content-free writing. Everything he's ever done or does should be in disappearing ink to match the "lasting" mental picture it forms. He's the poster boy for the death of rock criticism.

mikesniper

  • Guest
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2008, 06:28:24 PM »
Eat Skull=2,100 plays so far today on MySpace.

Now we're talking 'bout 'FORKPOWER!
« Last Edit: July 14, 2008, 09:54:17 PM by mikesniper »

proofrock

  • Pseudointellectual
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 114
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2008, 06:31:13 PM »
Maybe you're right -- I did learn a thing or two from Chemical Imbalance when I was younger, though, so I got a soft spot. Sick of hangers-on.

How many days until that Dead Families 7" breaks three figures?

TTT

  • Most Valuable Primate
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5239
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2008, 06:31:35 PM »
thats sick.  good observation though for sure.  totally fucked it's really that strong so fast.  like Advil.  Pitchfork told me about Advil.

griffith

  • Guest
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2008, 06:36:51 PM »
A good border collie can move more sheep than Pitchfork any day. Plus the dog is smarter and more fun.

TTT

  • Most Valuable Primate
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5239
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #9 on: July 14, 2008, 06:45:24 PM »
how much for a banner on the left side of the dog?  right side?  multiple month discounts?  recommendation barks at the sheep?

Old Kyle

  • City Rocker
  • *********
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2771
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #10 on: July 14, 2008, 06:51:20 PM »
I guess paragraphs 2 and 3 were kinda dumb, but the first and last paragraphs seemed about as valid as any reviews you read these days to me.  Musically speaking, it wasn't that clueless.

TTT

  • Most Valuable Primate
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5239
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2008, 06:54:01 PM »
A good border collie can move more sheep than Pitchfork any day. Plus the dog is smarter and more fun.

Its pretty intense how Mike made that point though.  It shows how swiftly a herd of people is suddenly catapulted over into a very minute little obscure corner area of the web.  It's not like I didn't know they had pull, but I remember on that other Siltbreeze/Pitchfork thread there was a lot of guess-work being done with regard to the exact impact of the article on the masses of readers.  Well, this got some specific numbers.


I guess paragraphs 2 and 3 were kinda dumb, but the first and last paragraphs seemed about as valid as any reviews you read these days to me.  Musically speaking, it wasn't that clueless.

I think it's the formatting too.  Whenever somebody opens a review with that many influences strung together it just really says "namedropper" to me.

grandmaster satch and the bi-curious five

  • City Rocker
  • *********
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2790
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #12 on: July 14, 2008, 06:54:29 PM »
Nearly two months after my own review, with like a fraction of the thoughtfulness and relevance. McGonigal knows better than to shit 'em out so disposably. I'm disappointed in Pitchfork.

Quote
mosurock kind of lost me with this one but i think he likes it:
http://dustedmagazine.com/reviews/4312

p.s. his lyric quotes are 75% wrong. its cool how song lyrics get personalized to the listener when you dont make a lyric sheet. 

SICK TO DEATH - THE LP and reviews of reviews!

"Cunda astratta montose eargrets gutt nos veratoos canda amantos canda"

Jared

  • Most Vertical Primate
  • *****************
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9697
  • Etc.
    • View Profile
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2008, 06:56:01 PM »
It's amazing how many "let's see how cool I can sound" obscure namedrops there are.  "None of my readers will know whether I'm accurately using this band referrence or not, so what the hell?  (reaches up ass)  Gun Club!  Yes, that's a good one.  Iconic yet still retaining some amount indie street credibility.  Hmmm I've seen mention of some of these so-called "diy" acts in referrence to this "shitcore" stuff so let 'em eat messthetticks: Tronics, Homosexuals, Chain Gang (they were British, right?), Desperate Bicycles.  And don't the kids just love it?" 

Nervous Gender?  Seriously!
« Last Edit: July 14, 2008, 06:58:17 PM by Jared »
Quote from: Investigate
like licking old pizza and trying to get a wet genital.

griffith

  • Guest
Re: Pitchfork Strikes Again! Latest Victim: Eat Skull
« Reply #14 on: July 14, 2008, 07:03:44 PM »
I guess paragraphs 2 and 3 were kinda dumb, but the first and last paragraphs seemed about as valid as any reviews you read these days to me.  Musically speaking, it wasn't that clueless.

Paragraph one uses a comparison to  11 bands and a series of DIY comps to try and say something. Sorry, that's awful writing. If you look up "clueless" in the dictionary you'll find McGonigal's name next to it. But you're right it is about as valid as most reviews you read nowadays.