I haven't read much Meltzer in a while, but I can definitely see this criticism. It doesn't really bother me much, and in fact it's pretty fitting for rock writer to create a persona for themselves (that's what rock's all about).
True. Pairs well with his other well-worn topic: the invisible line 'tween crit and rockstar in the '60s and early '70s.
The "bad boy" juvenilia jive is a lot less impressive to me than it once was. Just as unimpressive are his hip-shot moments, his tell-it-like-it-is reruns: Bangs was a rube, the Dolls were hogwash, Christgau was a tyrant, Patti Smith is ice-cold, on and on. Thankfully he had some incisive moments beyond all that.
Oh, and I don't believe that he doesn't read. Load of shit.
I still like Meltzer, but at this point I've marrowed his writing and don't need to read most of it again any time soon. Add to that the fact that he's one of the most often imitated critics in the game and I'm good without all of it for a long while. Then again,
The Night (Alone) is a damn good book. So who's full of shit?