« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: the beatles!  (Read 1632 times)

edgar allan shmoe

  • Avid Pitchfork Reader
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
    • sloppyporn
the beatles!
« on: March 27, 2011, 07:42:35 AM »
Logged

edgar allan shmoe

  • Avid Pitchfork Reader
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
    • sloppyporn
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2011, 05:38:15 AM »
www.beatlemainia.bandcamp.com

incase the download was too forward
Logged

bradx

  • Guest
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2011, 12:48:35 AM »
a short description would be a good way to interest people...
Logged

P-TNT

  • Most Valuable Primate
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6043
    • View Profile
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2011, 12:01:21 PM »
Quote from: Al Kida on May 07, 2011, 12:48:35 AM
a short description would be a good way to interest people...
I dunno, I think that people should know beatles
Logged

bradx

  • Guest
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2011, 12:38:49 PM »
i do know the beatles and i already own everything by them that i care to own.  i assumed this was some sort of cover project.  whatever it is, a short description would be a good way to interest people...
Logged

edgar allan shmoe

  • Avid Pitchfork Reader
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
    • sloppyporn
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #5 on: May 11, 2011, 10:19:52 AM »
it aint a beatles covers, were a band from montreal. were touring eastern canada in June and releasing another tape soon.
Logged

enthusiast

  • Guest
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #6 on: May 11, 2011, 10:53:34 AM »
what a terrible band name.
Logged

edgar allan shmoe

  • Avid Pitchfork Reader
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
    • sloppyporn
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2011, 08:31:31 AM »
im glad you think so
Logged

margin walker

  • Pseudointellectual
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
    • View Profile
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2011, 09:18:19 AM »
is the name ironic or something
Logged

bradx

  • Guest
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2011, 09:44:01 AM »
its fucking stupid is what it is.
Logged

margin walker

  • Pseudointellectual
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
    • View Profile
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2011, 02:35:14 PM »
i had a suspicion we'd eventually agree on something
Logged

edgar allan shmoe

  • Avid Pitchfork Reader
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
    • sloppyporn
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2011, 07:46:29 AM »
Logged

enthusiast

  • Guest
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2011, 07:48:06 AM »
dude change your band name
Logged

edgar allan shmoe

  • Avid Pitchfork Reader
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
    • sloppyporn
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2011, 02:20:23 PM »
the name is what it is, but i`d be much more interested in feedback regarding the merit of the actual music.
Logged

bradxxx

  • Guest
Re: the beatles!
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2011, 03:12:51 PM »
noone is going to bother to listen to your shitty music when you have such a stupid fucking name.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »